Business & Human Rights Resource Centre: Home

Skip the page content navigation if you do not require links to content sections within this page.

Page Content Navigation

Skip the main banner if you do not want to read it as the next section.

Page Banner

  • Centro de Información sobre Empresas y Derechos Humanos
  • Centre de Ressources sur les Entreprises et les Droits de l'Homme

Site last updated Thu 24 Apr 2014

Skip the primary navigation if you do not want to read it as the next section.


Primary navigation

Alternative Site Languages


Skip the main content if you do not want to read it as the next section.


Main Content

Main Content: Drummond lawsuit (re Colombia)

Case profile: Drummond lawsuit (re Colombia)

Jump to: News on this case

Para la versión en español de este perfil de las demandas judiciales contra Drummond por actividades en Colombia, haga clic acá.

In 2002, the families of three deceased Colombian labour leaders and the union they belonged to, Sintramienergética, filed suit against Drummond Company, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Drummond Ltd. in US federal court.  The plaintiffs alleged that Drummond hired Colombian paramilitaries to kill and torture the three labour leaders in 2001.  Sintramienergética represents workers at Drummond’s coal mining operations in Colombia.  The case was brought under the US Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), US Torture Victim Protection Act and Alabama state law.  Drummond sought dismissal of the case, which the court granted as to the state law claims and one of the ATCA claims in 2003.  The court declined to dismiss the ATCA claims for extrajudicial killing and for denial of rights to associate and organise.  In March 2007, the court ruled that the case against Drummond Ltd. (the subsidiary) would go to trial, but dismissed the case against Drummond Company (the parent company).  In June of 2007, the district court judge dismissed the wrongful death claims, but the judge allowed the plaintiffs’ war crimes allegations under ATCA (summary execution) to stand.  The trial was held in July 2007.  The jury acquitted Drummond finding that the company was not liable for the deaths of the three murdered labour leaders.  On 11 December 2007, the plaintiffs filed their opening brief to appeal the lower court's verdict with the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

In March 2009, the children of three slain Colombian union leaders filed a new lawsuit in US federal court against Drummond alleging the company's complicity in the killings.  Another lawsuit was filed in US federal court against Drummond in May 2009 alleging that the company had made payments to the paramilitary group United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (known by its Spanish acronym AUC) to kill labour leaders.  Drummond has denied these allegations.  While a lower court dismissed the lawsuit brought by the union leaders' children, on 3 February 2011 the federal court of appeals reversed this dismissal and remanded the case to the lower court.  The court of appeals found that the children did have standing to pursue their claims against Drummond and remanded their previously dismissed claims under the Alien Tort Claims Act and the Torture Victim Protection Act for further proceedings at the trial court level.  On 25 July 2013 the district court judge dismissed the case against Drummond finding that the court no longer had jurisdiction to hear the case, citing the US Supreme Court's decision in Kiobel v. Shell.

In February 2013 a former contractor for Drummond was sentenced by a Colombian court to 38 years in prison for organizing the killing of two labour leaders in 2001.  The judge ordered prosecutors to investigate Drummond’s president and several former employees to determine whether they had a role in the killings.

 

- "War crimes lawsuit against Drummond dismissed", Ryan Poe, Birmingham Business Journal, 31 Jul 2013
- "Colombian judge convicts ex-contractor in Drummond union leader killing", Associated Press, 6 Feb 2013
- "Mining Company Faces Suit Over Union Killings", Kevin Duvall, 4 Feb 2011
- "Suit claims Ala. coal firm funded Colombian terror", Bob Johnson, AP, 28 May 2009
- "Children Sue Ala. Company In Colombian Mine Deaths", Jay Reeves, AP, 20 Mar 2009

- "Alabama Company Is Exonerated in Murders at Colombian Mine", Kyle Whitmore, New York Times, 27 Jul 2007

- “Drummond case shows danger facing Colombian unions”, Hugh Bronstein, Reuters, 16 Nov 2006

- “US firm sued after mine union leaders' deaths”, Andrew Gumbel, Independent [UK], 25 Mar 2002

 

- Drummond Ltd.: [PDF] Drummond does not negotiate with illegal groups; the Company emphatically rejects all charges against the company and its executives, 21 Mar 2007 [press release]

- Drummond Company: Drummond's Colombian Operations

- International Rights Advocates [plaintiffs’ co-counsel]: Drummond [includes links to certain news items about the case and certain legal documents]

 

- US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama: [PDF] Balcero Giraldo, et al. v. Drummond Company - Memorandum Opinion Granting Summary Judgment, 25 Jul 2013
- [PDF] Balcero Giraldo, et al. v. Drummond Company - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, 17 Sep 2012
- US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit: [PDF] Locarno Baloco, et al. v. Drummond Company, Inc., 3 Feb 2011
- [PDF] Romero, et al. v. Drummond, et al. - Appellants' Opening Brief, 11 Dec 2007
- [PDF] Estate of Valmore Lacarno Rodriguez v. Drummond Company - Complaint, 14 Mar 2002

 

- US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit: [PDF] Juan Aquas Romero v. Drummond Company, 14 Mar 2007 [order unsealing certain case documents]
- US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama: [PDF] Estate of Valmore Lacarno Rodriguez v. Drummond Company, 14 Apr 2003 [order dismissing certain claims, declining to dismiss claims for extrajudicial killings and denial of rights to associate & organise]

Search Summary

Change the order of results and sort by one of the following: | publication date | date added to site | title


Send us comments & suggested additions

Any company or organization wishing to submit a clarification or response to an item is welcome to do so.


The following page sections include static unchanging site components such as the page banner, useful links and copyright information. Return to the top of page if you want to start again.


Page Extras and footer content

End of page. You can return to the page content navigation from here.