Business & Human Rights Resource Centre: US legal doctrines

Skip the page content navigation if you do not require links to content sections within this page.

Page Content Navigation

Skip the main banner if you do not want to read it as the next section.

Page Banner

  • Centro de Información sobre Empresas y Derechos Humanos
  • Centre de Ressources sur les Entreprises et les Droits de l'Homme

Site last updated Thu 28 Aug 2008

Skip the primary navigation if you do not want to read it as the next section.


Primary navigation

Alternative Site Languages


Skip the main content if you do not want to read it as the next section.


Main Content: US legal doctrines

US legal doctrines

The following are legal doctrines that are often invoked in US Alien Tort Claims Act lawsuits, typically by defendants arguing that a court should not hear the case, or by courts justifying dismissal of the case.
 

Act of state
The principle that no nation can judge the legality of a foreign country's sovereign acts within its own territory.” 
-Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004)

See also:
- entry in International Law: A Dictionary, by Boleslaw Boczek, 2005
- post by Tobias Thienel on “The Core” (blog on human rights, humanitarian law, intl. criminal law)
- Wikipedia entry
 

Forum non conveniens (inconvenient forum)
The doctrine that an appropriate forum…may divest itself of jurisdiction if, for the convenience of the litigants and the witnesses, it appears that the action should proceed in another forum in which the action might also have been properly brought in the first place.
-Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004)

See also:
- Law.com dictionary entry
- Wikipedia entry
 

International comity
...rules of courtesy or goodwill which states observe in their mutual relations without any sense of legal obligation under international law
-International Law: A Dictionary, Boleslaw Boczek, 2005 (full entry)

See also Wikipedia entry
 

Political question
the determination by a court...that an issue raised about the conduct of public business is a ‘political’ issue to be determined by the legislature...or the executive branch and not by the courts
-Law.com Dictionary (full entry)

See also:
- Wikipedia entry
- “The political question doctrine, executive discretion, and foreign affairs”, Nada Mourtada-Sabbah, in White House Studies journal, summer 2003 (abstract)


design image

The following page sections include static unchanging site components such as the page banner, useful links and copyright information. Return to the top of page if you want to start again.


Page Extras and footer content

End of page. You can return to the page content navigation from here.