abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Artikel

13 Sep 2004

Autor:
Eric Reeves, Smith College [USA]

Darfur, Southern Sudan, and the Moral Imperative of (Equity) Divestment: Which companies and nations are propping up the Khartoum regime?

...the central purpose of the divestment campaign must be to force these complicit companies to suspend all business and commercial activities in Khartoum until the genocide in Darfur ends and a final peace agreement with the people of southern Sudan is signed and implemented. [refers to MiG, Siemens, ABB, Alcatel, Tatneft, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), PetroChina, Goldman Sachs, "the state-owned oil companies of...Malaysia and India" [Petronas, ONGC (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation)], Trafigura Beheer, Greater Nile Petroleum Operating Co., California Public Employees Retirement System (Calpers) & other US state pension funds, TIAA-CREF]