Germany: NGO wins greenwashing lawsuits against Lufthansa and Adidas over misleading sustainability claims
Zusammenfassung
Date Reported: 28 Mär 2025
Standort: Deutschland
Unternehmen
Lufthansa - Service providerBetroffen
Total individuals affected: Number unknown
Verbraucher: ( Number unknown - Location unknown - Sector unknown , Gender not reported ) , Gruppe für Umweltfragen: ( Number unknown - Deutschland - Sector unknown , Gender not reported )Themen
Informationszugang , Clean, Healthy & Sustainable Environment , Company Policies , Lawsuits & regulatory actionAntwort
Response sought: Nein
Art der Quelle: News outlet
Zusammenfassung
Date Reported: 28 Mär 2025
Standort: Deutschland
Unternehmen
adidas Group - Parent CompanyBetroffen
Total individuals affected: Number unknown
Gruppe für Umweltfragen: ( Number unknown - Deutschland - Sector unknown , Gender not reported ) , Verbraucher: ( Number unknown - Location unknown - Sector unknown , Gender not reported )Themen
Informationszugang , Clean, Healthy & Sustainable Environment , Company Policies , Lawsuits & regulatory actionAntwort
Response sought: Nein
Art der Quelle: News outlet
"NGO wins greenwashing lawsuits against German airline, apparel company", 28 March 2025.
NGO Environmental Action Germany (DUH) has won separate greenwashing lawsuits against airline Lufthansa and apparel company Adidas on the grounds of misleading consumers with sustainability claims.
In the case against Lufthansa, the regional court in Cologne found that consumers choosing the "offset flight" option were left in the dark as to the extent of the airline's climate compensation and in relation to the specifically booked flight. Additionally, it remained unclear what exactly was to be offset and to what extent, and that the purchase of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) gave the impression that their contribution relates to their flight.
"The court confirms our criticism and addresses how one of the world's largest airlines systematically deceives customers and pretends that air travel is climate-neutral in exchange for additional fees," said DUH...
The NGO had accused Lufthansa of using a compensation model that only accounted for a fraction of air traffic's climate impacts...
In the case against Adidas, the Nuremberg-Fürth Regional Court ordered the company to no longer advertise the statement that it will be climate neutral by 2050, as there were no concrete steps on how this goal would be achieved beyond 2030. "Advertising a company or its products with an alleged climate neutrality can have a significant impact on purchase decisions," DUH quoted from the judgement...
The NGO called on the incoming German government to establish clear rules and impose fines for consumer deception. The EU has taken steps to regulate green claims. Both verdicts are not final.