abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Artikel

5 Feb 2008

Autor:
Compiled by Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Human Rights First, “Private Security Contractors at War: Ending the Culture of Impunity”: company responses & non-responses

In January 2008 Human Rights First published the report "Private Security Contractors at War: Ending the Culture of Impunity”...Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited seven private security companies to respond...[As of 2 Feb 2008]: - Aegis response - Blackwater response - Crescent Security response - Custer Battles: Several attempts were made to contact this company but they were unsuccessful - KBR [responses]... - Triple Canopy response - Zapata Engineering has not responded

Part of the following timelines

Human Rights First report says failure to hold private security contractors accountable for abuses has created a “culture of impunity"

Human Rights First, “Private Security Contractors at War: Ending the Culture of Impunity”: company responses & non-responses, Jan 2008