abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

This page is not available in Deutsch and is being displayed in English


[PDF] In the High Court of South Africa - Witwatersrand Local Division - In the matter between Thembekile Mankayi (Plaintiff) and AngloGold Ashanti (Defendant)

Thembekile Mankayi...hereby institutes action against [AngloGold Ashanti]...From on or about 4 January 1979 until on or about 11 September 1995 the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant...as a mineworker...The Plaintiff was exposed to environmental conditions in the workplace that were determined, regulated and controlled by the Defendant...Throughout the period of employment the Defendant owed the Plaintiff a duty to provide a safe and healthy work environment that was not injurious to his health.

Part of the following stories

AngloGold Ashanti silicosis lawsuit (So. Africa)

So. Africa: Lawsuit against AngloGold Ashanti on behalf of miner with silicosis seen as test case