abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

This page is not available in Deutsch and is being displayed in English

Artikel

13 Jun 2012

Autor*in:
Jennifer Green, counsel for amici

[PDF] Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum - Brief on Re-Argument of amici curiae the Institute for Human Rights and Business, Errol P. Mendes, David Petrasek, John F. Sherman, III and the University of Minnesota Human Rights Litigation and International

The Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 28 U.S.C. §1350 was enacted by Congress to provide a federal forum for tort claims by aliens for violations of the law of nations or treaties of the United States. Despite this congressional mandate, respondents’ amicus Products Liability Advisory Council, Inc. (PLAC) wrongly argues that suits by aliens against corporations place an unsustainable burden on corporations and the federal courts. Amici write to correct PLAC’s misstatements and distortions about ATS litigation.

Story Timeline