abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Klage

Synohydro arbitration case (re Coca Codo Sinclair hydroelectric project, Ecuador)

Status: ONGOING

Date lawsuit was filed
17 Mai 2021
Datumsgenauigkeit
Alle/s korrekt
Nicht zutreffend
Public entity
Ort der Einreichung: Ecuador
Ort des Vorfalls: Ecuador
Art des Rechtsstreits: Internationales Gremium

Unternehmen

Power Construction Corporation (PowerChina) China Energie, Erneuerbare energien, Bau
PowerChina (Power Construction Corporation of China) China Energie, Transportwesen: Allgemein, Bau, Bergbau

Quellen

Snapshot: On 17 May 2021, Ecuador filed an arbitration claim against Sinohydro before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce. They argued that Sinohydro hid information about significant defects, specifically over 8,000 cracks in the turbine distributors of the Coca Codo Sinclair hydroelectric plant, since 2012. This concealment led to ongoing operational issues and financial losses, prompting Ecuador to seek arbitration for damages. It has been reported that the dam led to regressive erosion of the Coca river.

In June 2025, Ecuador ended the arbitration after reaching a $400m compensation agreement with PowerChina, Sinohydro's state-owned parent company. In exchange, PowerChina will assume operations. The deal was questioned by critics over the appropriateness of granting operation to the company that built the defective dam, while long-term reliability of the dam remained in doubt.