Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Background & commentaries on social & environmental impacts

Background

The European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA) are currently negotiating a trade agreement referred to as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).  It aims to reduce trade barriers on goods and services in a wide range of sectors.  Most of the negotiations are centred on reducing regulatory barriers to trade, including making EU and US laws relating to health, safety, environment and financial security more compatible, and on measures protecting the rights of the investors.

Advocates for the TTIP argue that it will increase GDP growth in both regions, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, and make cheaper products and services available to consumers.  

The first round of negotiations took place in June 2013.  Once finalised, the agreement will need to be approved by the European Parliament, EU Member States and the US Congress.  Documents and information are available on the European Commission’s website and the website of the Office of the US Trade Representative.   

Key business & human rights concerns

Civil society in both in the EU and US have raised various concerns about the TTIP, and opposition has been widespread.  There have been large protests across Europe and in 2014, an online consultation conducted by the European Commission received 150,000 responses, 97% of which were negative.  

Social cost of weakened regulations

One of the biggest concerns is the regulatory convergence of standards. This is largely related to arguments that there will be heavy social costs related to the regulatory convergence surrounding health, workers’ rights, consumer safety and the environment, and the strengthening of the rights of foreign investors.  In Europe, in order to reduce barriers on the trade of food, EU standards on food safety and the environment will be brought closer to those of the US, which are much less strict.  70% of all processed foods in the US contain genetically modified ingredients, while the EU allows virtually no GM foods.  On the other hand, US financial regulation is currently stricter than in the EU and it too could be weakened to match with EU standards.

Investor state dispute settlement

Investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) allows foreign investors to bring proceedings against the country hosting their investment, if they have been disadvantaged by an act of the government.  This act could be legislation aimed at improving social or environmental protections, or a local council denying a permit for environmental reasons, or measures aimed at regaining government control in public services.  Arbitral tribunals are outside the domestic legal system, do not have an appeals mechanism and are often private.  Foreign investors can thus bypass national courts, and challenge what may otherwise be a legitimate policy.

In response to these concerns, the EU commission proposed an Investment Court System, which will be comprised of judges and have an appeals mechanism.  However, a study carried out by ClientEarth finds that any international agreement containing ISDS or an investment court would not be legal under EU law as it would undermine the powers of the European Court of Justice and the European internal market.

Lack of environmental protections

Following a leaked document, environmental campaigners have also cautioned about the impacts on climate change of the proposed energy provisions, as there are no strong commitments to environmental protection or sustainable development. 

Lack of transparency & business lobbying

Further concerns include excessive business influence over the negotiations as well as the lack of transparency surrounding the talks.  Most of the preparatory meetings of the negotiations were with industry lobby groups, where the information of these meetings was not publicly disclosed, and very few of these meetings were attended by civil society.

 

Get RSS feed of these results

Stories and Komponenten mit diesem Schwerpunkt

Artikel
2 December 2013
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: George Monbiot, Guardian (UK)

…The [EU] commission insists that its Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership should include a toxic mechanism called investor-state dispute settlement.  Where this has been forced into other trade agreements, it has allowed big corporations to...

Mehr

Artikel
9 April 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Baskut Tuncak, Center for International Environmental Law

It might come as a shock to EU voters to learn exactly how weak US laws are when it comes to toxic chemicals, especially when the US’s chief negotiator for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has been claiming otherwise.  This...

Mehr

Artikel
16 April 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Corporate Europe Observatory

In January, in response to growing public concern over the proposed EU-US trade deal (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, TTIP), the European Commission announced it was halting negotiations over the deal’s controversial investor rights to...

Mehr

Artikel
13 May 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: European Commission

The European Commission is consulting the public in the EU on a possible approach to investment protection and ISDS [Investor-to-state dispute settlement] in the [Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership] TTIP. The proposed approach contains a...

Mehr

Artikel
14 May 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Center for Food Safety

Center for Food Safety (CFS) today released a report examining the potential food and farming impacts of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a broad trade agreement currently under negotiation by the United States and the...

Mehr

Artikel
16 May 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Tanja Milevska, EurActiv

240 people were arrested on Thursday (15 May) around the European Business Summit venue in Brussels during non-violent protests organised by trade unions and citizens’ groups.  The protestors had gathered to denounce the budgetary austerity policies in...

Mehr

Artikel
19 May 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: RT (USA)

Most of the working groups involved in trade negotiations are represented by industries and such biased approaches raise concerns over access and the transparency of the whole process...“If you want to be a part of the trade negotiations with Europe or...

Mehr

Artikel
8 July 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Friends of the Earth Europe

A leaked European Union document published today by the Washington Post exposes the dangerous direction the trade deal between the U.S. and the EU is taking when it comes to raw material and energy.  The leaked position paper reveals that the proposed...

Mehr

Artikel
10 July 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: ETUC & AFL-CIO

We strongly encourage the United States and the European Union to approach the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in a manner that puts shared prosperity and sustainable social and economic development at the centre of the agreement...

Mehr

Artikel
15 July 2014
+ English - Verbergen

Autor/in: Amanda Kistler, Center for International Environmental Law & Michael Haines, ClientEarth

"TTIP crosses the line on toxic chemicals for 111 NGOs", 10 Jul 2014...

Mehr