You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
Australian-based developer appeals historic decision against Solomon Islands bauxite mine
Author: Environmental Defenders Office New South Wales (EDO NSW), Published on: 18 May 2019
The first and ground-breaking decision by the Solomon Islands Environment Advisory Committee (EAC) refusing development consent for a bauxite mine on Wagina Island has been appealed by the developer, Solomon Bauxite Limited (SBL).
...[T]he EAC found that:
- Legislative procedures for public consultation and publication of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) were not followed;
- the EIS did not meet legislative and regulatory requirements;
- the decision to issue a development consent is inconsistent with the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; and
- there were unacceptable impacts to the environment, the residents of Wagina and their livelihoods and on nearby islands and marine environment.
- SBL, which appears to be have been backed by Australian, New Zealand and Hong Kong based interests, was granted the development consent in 2013.
SBL is appealing the EAC decision ...to the Minister of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management & Meteorology....
EDO NSW's International Program is assisting the Landowners Advocacy and Legal Support Unit (LALSU) within the Solomon Islands Public Solicitor's Office (PSO) in responding to this appeal.