hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

Australian-based developer appeals historic decision against Solomon Islands bauxite mine

Author: Environmental Defenders Office New South Wales (EDO NSW), Published on: 18 May 2019

May 2019

The first and ground-breaking decision by the Solomon Islands Environment Advisory Committee (EAC) refusing development consent for a bauxite mine on Wagina Island has been appealed by the developer, Solomon Bauxite Limited (SBL).

...[T]he EAC found that:

  • Legislative procedures for public consultation and publication of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) were not followed;
  • the EIS did not meet legislative and regulatory requirements;
  • the decision to issue a development consent is inconsistent with the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; and
  • there were unacceptable impacts to the environment, the residents of Wagina and their livelihoods and on nearby islands and marine environment.
  • SBL, which appears to be have been backed by Australian, New Zealand and Hong Kong based interests, was granted the development consent in 2013.

SBL is appealing the EAC decision ...to the Minister of Environment, Climate Change, Disaster Management & Meteorology....

EDO NSW's International Program is assisting the Landowners Advocacy and Legal Support Unit (LALSU) within the Solomon Islands Public Solicitor's Office (PSO) in responding to this appeal.

Read the full post here