Beyond Social Auditing

Ando International garment factory (Better Work Vietnam)_ILO Asia and Pacific_via_flickr

Independent and diligent audits seem rare and require, at best, a sort of 'checklist compliance'.

Carolijn Terwindt, ECCHR & Gisela Burckhardt, FEMNET

The growing scale and complexity of global supply chains as well as an increased emphasis on human and labour rights has led large multi-national companies to carry out their own social audits, hire private auditors to monitor the conditions in their supply chains and/or require certificates from factory owners. With the adoption of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the subsequent positioning of due diligence as the global standard of practice for companies on human rights, social audits are increasingly being used by companies to comply with their due diligence obligations (for more information and guidance on human rights due diligence see this section).

This trend is worrying given that numerous reports have found the practice to be ineffective in capturing human rights abuses in global supply chains, and ultimately in its current form to be failing workers. Incidents such as the Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh and the Ali Enterprises fire in Pakistan, both of which were audited shortly before the tragedies happened, have tragically drawn attention to the pitfalls of social auditing in the textile sector.

Research has also drawn attention to the particular impact this has on vulnerable workers including women, children and migrant and refugee workers. Human Rights Watch for example found that audits in the textile industry fail to address gender discrimination and sexual harassment at the workplace. Our own work on Syrian refugees in the Turkish garment industry also highlights this issue. Workers in other sectors such as agriculture, food and electronics have similarly experienced the shortcomings of social audits, thus raising important questions as to whether the current practice of social auditing is fit for purpose.

However there are a number of reform options and (emerging) alternatives including approaches such as auditor liability, the Worker-driven Social Responsibility model, mandatory human rights due diligence and innovations to grievance mechanisms. This portal will feature various perspectives and research on the pitfalls of social auditing, gather and share examples of where audits have failed, as well as materials exploring alternatives to the current practice of social auditing, including by companies.

We welcome input and views from all stakeholders, both on options for fundamentally reforming social auditing and on alternative models which seek to go beyond the practice.

Explore our blog series

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

22 November 2016

Romania: Investigation exposes child labour & exploitative conditions in Kinder Egg (owned by Ferrero) supply chain

Author: Nick Parker, Sun (UK)

"eggsploitation exposed: Kinder Egg ‘slaves’ paid 22p-an-hour to work 13-hour shifts making toys hidden inside chocolate treats are helped by kids aged SIX", 21 Nov 2016...

Read more

20 September 2016

China: IPE report raises concerns over pollution from a no. of suspected Disney suppliers; Disney responds

See full story

12 September 2016

Bangladesh: Fire at a food & cigarette packaging factory leaves 31 dead, 50 injured

Fire at Tampaco Foils Limited, a factory north of Dhaka has killed at least 31 people and injured more than 50 with fears that the death toll could rise. The cause of the fire at the food and cigarette packaging factory was not immediately known, but...

See full story

9 August 2016

India: Investigations highlight child labour, debt bondage & illegal operations in mica mines

Investigations highlighted incidences of child labour, debt-bondage and unsafe work conditions mica mines of various indian states. Many of these mines are reported to be operating without licenses. The mica sourced from some of these mines is...

See full story

17 July 2016

Reports allege poor working conditions in shoe supply chains in Eastern Europe; company responses included

The recently released reports by the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), “Labour on a Shoestring” and “Trampling Workers Rights Underfoot”, as well as the initiative “Change your Shoes” demonstrate the responsibility for respecting human rights for shoe bra...

See full story

4 July 2016

China: China Labor Watch investigation found work hours & occupational safety violations at Dongguan Chengming Electronic factory

[Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited Dongguan Chengming to repond, the company responded (available in Chinese only)]...

See full story

5 May 2016

So. Africa: BASF criticised for human rights performance of supplier company Lonmin; aims to set up grievance mechanism

See full story

31 March 2016

UK: Sedex releases new guidance for auditors to tackle under-reporting of forced labour

On 22 March 2016, the Sedex Associate Auditor Group released guidance on how auditors can detect indicators of forced labour.  The guidance, co-authored by Marianne Voss, Sedex's stakeholder executive and David Camp, Stronger Together's programme coor...

See full story

9 March 2016

Modern slavery statements: Ergon report analyses who is reporting and what companies say they are doing

A new report from Ergon analyses a hundred 'modern slavery statements' in terms of who is reporting and what companies say they are doing. The UK's Modern Slavery Act 2015 requires companies with a global turnover of more than £36 million to make an...

See full story

29 February 2016

Fair Labor Association assessment on Turkish Hugo Boss factory raises concerns over freedom of association

In January 2016 Fair Labor Association released an assessment regarding a Hugo Boss factory in Turkey.  The report made various recommendations to the company in respect of a number of workplace issues including on health & safety and freedom of a...

See full story