hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

Cape/Gencor lawsuits (re So. Africa)

In 1997, a group of five South Africans suffering from asbestos-related disease (ARD) brought suit against Cape PLC in the English High Court seeking compensation for their injuries from Cape’s asbestos mining and milling activity in South Africa.  The plaintiffs, former Cape workers and individuals living in the vicinity of Cape’s operations, alleged that Cape exposed its workers to 30 times the British legal limit of asbestos dust without adequate protective gear and that asbestos related injuries were suffered by those living near Cape’s asbestos operations.  After the claim was filed, Cape applied to stay these claims on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that the case should be tried in South Africa.  At the beginning of 1998, Cape’s application was granted by the trial court, but the Court of Appeals later reversed the lower court’s decision.  In 1999, another 2000 claims were commenced against Cape in England for ARD based on Cape’s activity in South Africa.  Cape reapplied to stay these new claims, in addition to those filed in 1997, and Cape’s application was granted.  On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s ruling.  The plaintiffs then appealed to the UK House of Lords, and in 2000 the Law Lords held that the case should be allowed to continue in the English High Court.  The Law Lords found that South African courts would not be a viable alternative forum because legal aid in South Africa had been withdrawn for personal injury claims and no reasonable likelihood existed for the plaintiffs to acquire effective legal representation on a contingency fee basis for a case of such complexity.  After the House of Lords decision, more claimants joined the case, and by 2001 there were approximately 7500 claimants.  In 2001, Cape agreed to a £21 million out-of-court settlement with the plaintiffs, but the company encountered financial problems in August 2002 and did not meet the agreed settlement terms.  Therefore, the litigation recommenced in September 2002, and Gencor Ltd. was joined as a defendant in the case.  Gencor is a South African company which took over some of Cape’s South African asbestos operations when Cape left the country in 1979. 

In 2003, the plaintiffs, Cape and Gencor reached a settlement agreement.  There were three parts to the settlement.  First, Gencor established and now administers a £35 million trust in South Africa (the trust is to compensate ARD victims in South Africa who were not represented by Leigh Day & Co.).  Second, Cape settled with its 7500 claimants for £7.5 million.  Third, Gencor settled with the 7500 claimants for approximately £3 million.

 

- [PDF] “Cape plc: South African Mineworkers' Quest for Justice”, Richard Meeran [counsel for plaintiffs], International Journal of Occupational Environmental Health, Jul/Sep 2003

- Action for Southern Africa: “Cape Caves in on South African Asbestos Case”, 13 Mar 2003

 

- Cape PLC: Cape Annual Report 2003 [scroll to page 47, item 26(ii) for discussion of 2003 settlement]

 

- Leigh Day & Co. (plaintiffs’ counsel): South African Asbestos Victims Finally Get Their Money, 30 Jun 2003

- Thompsons Solicitors (counsel for claimants suing Gencor): Landmark Settlement Brings Justice for Thousands of SA Former Asbestos Miners, 13 Mar 2003

 

- UK House of Lords: Judgments - Schalk Willem Burger Lubbe (Suing as Administrator of the Estate of Rachel Jacoba Lubbe) and 4 Others and Cape Plc. and Related Appeals, 20 July 2000 [House of Lords decision]

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Article
4 June 2001

Justice delayed for a childhood in asbestos

Author: Chris McGreal, Guardian [UK]

South Africans seek belated compensation [from British company Cape PLC] for their apartheid-era exploitation

Read the full post here

Article
22 May 2001

Trial date set, as Cape [British asbestos company Cape PLC] hints at settlement

Author: ACTSA [Action for South Africa]

Read the full post here

Article
10 May 2001

Cape [British asbestos company Cape PLC] shamed at AGM [annual general meeting]

Author: ACTSA [Action for South Africa]

Read the full post here

Article
1 April 2001

Apartheid's Killer Legacy

Author: ACTSA [Action for South Africa]

[regarding the conduct of British asbestos company Cape PLC in South Africa]

Read the full post here

Article
1 April 2001

Apartheid's Killer Legacy

Author: ACTSA [Action for South Africa]

[regarding the conduct of British asbestos company Cape PLC in South Africa]

Read the full post here

Article
21 September 2000

Landmark Law Lords ruling on jurisdiction over companies

Author: Human Rights & Business Matters, newsletter of Amnesty International UK Business Group

Read the full post here

Article
1 September 2000

Global Asbestos Justice: South African Asbestos Victims Win Right to Sue Cape plc in UK Courts

Author: Laurie Kazen-Allen, Multinational Monitor

Read the full post here

Article
1 August 2000

Companies with nowhere to hide

Author: Richard Meeran [solicitor for claimants], in The Times [London]

Read the full post here

Article
20 July 2000

Full text of the [UK] House of Lords judgment in the Cape plc case

Author: House of Lords [UK]

Read the full post here

Article
21 June 2000

Applying International Law to Multinational Corporations

Author: Saman Zia-Zarifi, Corporate Watch magazine

Read the full post here