hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

"Carving up a continent" report by WDM, and company responses

In April 2014, World Development Movement released a report, Carving up a continent: How the UK government is facilitating the corporate takeover of African food systems [PDF].  The report states:

"The UK’s Department for International Development (DfID) is channelling £600 million of aid money through the G8’s New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition... [This and other] initiatives claim to support improvements to agriculture and food security in Africa, but are in fact geared towards helping multinational companies to access resources and bringing about policy changes to facilitate those companies’ expansion in Africa.  The African countries being targeted by the New Alliance are not those with the highest levels of hunger or poverty, but those with the best access to export markets and the highest levels of economic growth.  This report provides evidence that while multinational corporations are set to benefit from increased access to and control of agriculture in Africa, this is coming at the expense of small-scale African food producers... Instead of providing a solution to hunger, the pro-corporate approach of initiatives like the New Alliance is likely to exacerbate hunger and poverty through increased land-grabbing, insecure and poorly paid jobs, the privatisation of seed and a focus on producing for export markets rather than to feed local populations... Companies taking over land sometimes promise to create jobs for the people they have dispossessed, but jobs that materialise are often insecure and poorly paid.  Jobs are also more likely to benefit men rather than women."

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited Diageo, Monsanto, SABMiller and Unilever to respond to the report:

Diageo did not respond

Monsanto response [DOC] - 20 May 2014

SABMiller response [PDF] - 19 May 2014

Unilever response [PDF] - 20 May 2014

Roche resigned from IPASA end of January 2014. The campaign proposed by PAE to IPASA is neither in the interest of Roche, nor of our industry in South Africa, and undermined the good relationship we have established with the South African authorities.


We believe that access to quality healthcare is a shared responsibility, requiring all stakeholders to work together, which requires a collaborative and inclusive approach based on mutual trust.   

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

Company response
20 May 2014

Response by Monsanto: re impacts on small farmers in Africa

Read full response

Company response
20 May 2014

Response by Unilever: re impacts on small farmers in Africa

Read full response

Company response
19 May 2005

Response by SABMiller: re impacts on small farmers in Africa

Read full response