abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

The content is also available in the following languages: 简体中文, 繁體中文

Story

27 Sep 2016

China: Excessively high legal cost may hinder development of environmental public interest litigations

"The All China Environmental Federation (ACEF) won lawsuit against Zhenhua for its long-standing failure to curb the release of harmful gases…[which] made legal history by becoming China’s first public interest action to be brought against air polluters.…But …[t]he court rejected a request from ACEF for the imposition of punitive damages on Zhenhua Ltd…and the NGO was forced to cover [costly] legal expenses…. The outcome…highlighted the financial difficulty of prosecuting big, industrial firms, which has led to a rising number of NGOs opting not to pursue legal action…"