hide message

Hello! Welcome to the Resource Centre.

We hope you find our free tools and resources useful. Did you know we also work directly with community advocates, providing them with the skills and resources to document corporate human rights abuses and effectively communicate with business?

This is only possible through generous donations from people like you.

Please consider supporting our work.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

Commentary: California Transparency in Supply Chains Act no longer defence against consumer protection claims against companies

Author: Sean Selleck & Sunil Rao, Baker & McKenzie (UK) , Published on: 18 April 2017

California was the first jurisdiction to introduce transparency compliance requirements to global supply chains.  Businesses have sought and succeeded in using their compliance with the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act 2010 to defeat claims under the California Unfair Competition Law, California Consumers Legal Remedies Act and False Advertising Law, on the basis of the safe harbour doctrine.  However, the utilisation of the safe harbour doctrine in this manner, appears to be changing.  This article explores key case law from 2015-2016, detailing the changing approach by the California judiciary...

Download the full document here

Related companies: Mars Nestlé