hide message

Hello! Welcome to the Resource Centre.

We hope you find our free tools and resources useful. Did you know we also work directly with community advocates, providing them with the skills and resources to document corporate human rights abuses and effectively communicate with business?

This is only possible through generous donations from people like you.

Please consider supporting our work.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

Critiques of Guiding Principles by Amnesty Intl., Human Rights Watch, FIDH, others - debate with Ruggie

On 22 November 2010, UN Special Representative on business & human rights John Ruggie proposed draft "Guiding Principles for the Implementation of the United Nations 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework", and launched a consultation on the Guiding Principles to which all stakeholders could submit comments.
- Draft report by Special Representative Ruggie with full text of Guiding Principles & commentaries [PDF]

The consultation received over 100 submissions (all available here), positive and negative, including many from NGOs.  Among them, Amnesty International, CIDSE, ESCR-Net, Human Rights Watch, International Commission of Jurists, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) made a joint submission:
"Joint Civil Society Statement on the draft Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights" [PDF], 14 Jan 2011

This submission garnered coverage in the Financial Times: "Rights groups slam UN plan for multinationals", Hugh Williamson, 17 Jan 2011.  Ruggie responded with this letter [PDF], 17 Jan 2011.  Amnesty International and FIDH then issued rejoinders:

Sir Mark Moody-Stuart and Stéphane Brabant of the law firm Herbert Smith made statements supportive of Ruggie in response to the NGO statement:

Human Rights Watch, Ruggie and Amnesty Intl. UK then engaged in this exchange:

 

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

Article
28 January 2011

Proper powers needed to uphold human rights

Author: Arvind Ganesan, Director, Business and Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, in letter to Financial Times

Sir, John Ruggie’s response to Hugh Williamson’s article “Amnesty criticises UN framework for multinationals” mischaracterises our views. Human rights organisations submitted comments to improve the proposed draft of guiding principles so that they...

Read more

Article
20 January 2011

Stronger UN draft on human rights abuses needed

Author: Widney Brown, Senior Director for International Law and Policy, Amnesty International

Sir, John Ruggie’s letter (January 19) in response to Hugh Williamson’s article “Amnesty criticises UN framework for multinationals” (January 17) is surprising on several counts...Let’s be frank – the real opposition to effective guiding principles...

Read more

Article
20 January 2011

[PDF] Response to Financial Times article and Professor Ruggie's response letter

Author: International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

Sir, The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is surprised by your interpretation of the NGOs' joint statement co-signed by FIDH on the draft Guiding Principles as well as Professor Ruggie's response to your article. While you do point out...

Read more