abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

12 Apr 2006

Author:
CEDHA (Center for Human Rights and Environment / Centro de Derechos Humanos y Ambiente)

[DOC] ING Group of Netherlands pulls out of controversial papermill while World Bank postpones loans following critical review of environmental impact studies [Uruguay]

...ING Group communicated to CEDHA that following recommendation by its advisory and coordinating team,...ING’s participation in the multimillion dollar Finnish papermill mill project by Botnia in Uruguay “is no longer in consideration”. In parallel, and just a few days earlier, the International Finance Corporation announced it would postpone consideration of loans to the papermill projects by ENCE of Spain and Botnia of Finland, until new identified shortcomings of the environmental and social impact studies could be addressed...The withdrawal of ING from the Botnia project responds to the systematic violations of both projects to policy, regulations and norms stipulating conditions for responsible and sustainable investment, including violations to the Equator Principles, violations that have been confirmed by the CAO.

Timeline