hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

[DOC] Response to Eastman Kodak from Political Economy Research Institute [USA]

Author: Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), Univ. of Massachusetts [USA], Published on: 25 May 2006

The US Environmental Protection Agency's Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) database is a peer-reviewed, state-of-the-art method for assessing the chronic human health risk posed by industrial toxic releases... TRI [Toxic Release Inventory] data are now available through 2004... Kodak's decrease in Hazard [a related score] from 2002, the most recent year of RSEI data available, to 2004, the most recent year of TRI data available, is approximately 14 percent. A decrease of 14 percent in Kodak's Toxic Score would still place Eastman Kodak among the Top 10 on the current Toxic 100. Greater emission reductions would be needed to drop Kodak from the top 10 of the Toxic 100.

Read the full post here

Related companies: Eastman Kodak