Hide Message

Updating the Resource Centre Digital Platform

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is at a critical point in its development. Our digital platform is home to a wealth of information on business and human rights, but hasn’t had a visual refresh for a number of years.

We will soon be updating the site to improve its usability and better serve the thousands of people that use our site to support their work.

Please take an advance peek at our new look, and let us know what you think!

Thank you,
Alex Guy, Digital Officer

Find Out More Hide Message

Ecuador: NGOs allege forced eviction of communities to make room for Chinese mining project Mirador, of Ecuacorriente

NGOs document forced evictions in May and September 2015, preceded by the killing in 2014 of a Shuar indigenous leader opposing Chinese mining project “Mirador”, owned by Ecuacorriente (part of Corriente Resources, which is part of China Railway Construction Company – CRCC - and Tongling).  Front Line Defenders made an appeal in October to stop the evictions. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited CRCC to respond but the company did not

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

19 July 2019

Ecuador: Local communities oppose country's largest copper mine funded by Chinese firm

Author: Ning Hui, China Dialogue

“Few options left for local communities opposing Ecuador’s largest copper mine”, 8 July 2019

The Mirador copper mine has pitted locals against the government and a Chinese mining company they say failed to consult them and forcibly evicted them…

… This large mine [Mirador copper mine] has ore reserves of 660 million tonnes and has been operated by Tongguan since 2010…

After three rounds of evictions, 136 people from 32 households in San Marcos [near Mirador] were forced to leave...

… lawyer Mario Melo Cevallos has been following the Mirador mine and representing the Kichwa in their human rights lawsuits. He complains that “the government approved the Mirador project without ever listening to social or environmental concerns”.

… The mine’s environmental impact has seen the greatest criticism. The Condor Range isn’t just a huge store of copper, it’s also incredibly rich in biodiversity…

… Lawyer Mario Melo Cevallos… [said] “Since 2013 those opposing the mine for various reasons have brought at least six lawsuits.”

Those lawsuits have complained of infringements of the rights of nature, of the murder of indigenous leaders, of infringement of community housing rights, and of the failure to allow indigenous people their right to free and prior consent. Subsequent lawsuits have attempted to address environmental destruction, to use constitutional protections against the tailings pond, and to use administrative processes to void existing environmental permits.

But so far, the cases against the mines – brought variously by local officials, indigenous community groups, individuals, environmental groups and scientists – have all been lost…

Tongguan maintains it did nothing wrong in the San Marcos evictions. “They’re always complaining about San Marcos, saying it was forced eviction and using it as a weapon against us,” says Zhu [community relations manager since 2013 for Tongguan]...

It is not rare for Chinese mining firms to encounter sustained opposition from indigenous communities. Li Ai, a policy specialist with Greenpeace... says: “Chinese firms often become the front line of interactions between local communities and various interest groups in the host nation.”…

According to Li Ai: “The direct economic benefits to local communities from oil and mining investments are tiny, but indigenous communities bear the brunt of environmental and other consequences. Wastewater flows into rivers, rainforests are destroyed, biodiversity is damaged, land is appropriated, and locals relocated. For the indigenous people, someone is walking into their home and destroying things they treasure.”…

In November 2018, Luis [chairman of the Amazonian Community of the Cóndor Mirador Mountain Range] travelled to Geneva to describe the Mirador case at a review of China’s human rights record at the UN Human Rights Council. The UN report on that review... contains China’s response. China undertook to: “Promote measures that ensure that development and infrastructure projects inside and outside its territory are fully consistent with human rights and respect the environment and the sustainability of natural resources, in line with applicable national and international law and the commitments of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”… [Also refers to Junefield Mineral Resources and the Hunan Gold Corporation, the China Aluminium Corporation, Zijin Mining, Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group, China Railway Construction Corporation, EcuaCorriente S.A., Corriente Resources]

Read the full post here

+ 简体中文 - Hide

Author: 宁卉, 中外对话(英国,中国)

“金山上的来客(下)”, 2019年7月8日




… 律师马里奥长期跟踪米拉多铜矿并代理厄瓜多尔克丘亚族人的人权官司。他说:「政府批准米拉多项目,从未听取过来自社会或环境层面的担忧。」


… 律师马里奥… [说]:「自2013年开始至今,不同领域的抗议者针对米拉多项目发起的法律诉讼至少有六次。」



铜冠坚持他们在圣马科斯驱逐并没有错。 朱先生[自2013年起担任社区关系经理]说︰「他们总是在就圣马科斯投诉,说是强制驱逐,并用它作为对付我们的武器」...



2018年11月,刘易斯[CASCOMI主席]远赴日内瓦,在联合国人权理事会审议时,就米拉多的案子做出陈述。打开2019年2月联合国发布的审议报告,中国针对厄瓜多尔提出的问题,回复将研究以下建议:「根据适用的国家和国际法以及《2030 年可持续发展议程》的承诺,促进采取措施,确保其领土内外的发展和基础设施项目完全符合人权,并尊重环境和自然资源的可持续性」… [文章提及考伦特资源]

Read the full post here

+ 繁體中文 - Hide

Author: 寧卉, 中外對話(英國,中國)

“金山上的來客(下)”, 2019年7月8日


厄瓜多爾首個大型露天銅礦米拉多(Mirador)…儲有6.6億噸銅礦,它所在的礦脈被業界認為是全世界最後一片尚未開發的銅礦。 2010年開始,米拉多由來自中國的中鐵建銅冠公司(以下簡稱”銅冠”)投資建設…


… 律師馬里奧長期跟踪米拉多銅礦並代理厄瓜多爾克丘亞族人的人權官司。他說:「政府批准米拉多項目,從未聽取過來自社會或環境層面的擔憂。」


… 律師馬里奧… [說]:「自2013年開始至今,不同領域的抗議者針對米拉多項目發起的法律訴訟至少有六次。」






2018年11月,劉易斯[CASCOMI主席]遠赴日內瓦,在聯合國人權理事會審議時,就米拉多的案子做出陳述。打開2019年2月聯合國發布的審議報告,中國針對厄瓜多爾提出的問題,回復將研究以下建議:「根據適用的國家和國際法以及《2030 年可持續發展議程》的承諾,促進採取措施,確保其領土內外的發展和基礎設施項目完全符合人權,並尊重環境和自然資源的可持續性」… [文章提及考倫特資源]

Read the full post here

Company non-response
4 January 2016

China Railway Construction did not respond

8 October 2015

“Ecuador: Demolition of homes of human rights defenders and Shuar community”

Author: Frontline Defenders

On 30 September 2015 police forces, accompanied by private security companies forcibly evicted families from the Amazonian Social Action Community and demolished their houses in Tundayme…The private forces were hired by Ecuacorriente, a Chinese company in charge of the Mirador Mining Project in the Cordillera del Cóndor, which is located in the East of the Zamora-Chinchipe province, on the Peruvian-Ecuadorian border…The indigenous communities sustain that they have the right to remain in their ancestral lands since the Ecuacorriente company has failed to conduct a thorough study of social impacts. The study of social impact is a mandatory step for the implementation of extractive projects according to international standards – such as Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organisation – and Ecuadorian law itself. There have been no consultations held with the local communities…Ecuacorriente asserts its right to continue its activities on the Mirador project based on a resolution issued by the Ministry of Mines and Oil in August 2008 (Acuerdo no 172) which, based on a narrow interpretation of the Constituent Resolution no.6, authorised all extractive projects not causing damage to water supplies. However, there is no legal basis for this resolution, as it is superseded by the Constituent Resolution no. 6…To date, the inhabitants of the region, members of the Shuar indigenous people, have not been consulted about the Mirador Mining Project nor on the extent to which would affect the local communities.

🚫Read the full post here