abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

28 Sep 2006

Author:
Miles Templeman, Director General, Institute of Directors [UK]

Further companies bill regulations would lessen accountability of directors to their shareholders [UK]

Directors already have serious concerns that the statutory expression of directors' duties contained in the companies bill will require them to make and record decisions in an artificial and burdensome way, without reaching a different decision from the one they would have made anyway. At the IoD we have long recognised, and teach on our courses, that decisions made in the boardroom must meet the interests of appropriate stakeholders. To go further than what we now have in the bill is, in the words of a former minister until recently responsible for this area of law, "bonkers", as it would diminish the directors' accountability to shareholders.