Germany: New social media law criticised for violating free speech & shifting regulatory responsibility to co's
All components of this story
Author: Global Voices
In an attempt to stifle hate speech and racial discrimination online, German lawmakers built one of the most controversial EU laws regulating online platforms in 2017.
Commonly known as “NetzDG”, Germany’s Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (Network Enforcement Law) requires large social media companies to proactively enforce German speech laws on their platforms. This has been met with a storm of criticism both at home and abroad...
While this increases pressure on the companies to respond, it also forces them to decide what is — and is not — hate speech. The short time frame in which the law expects companies to remove hate speech could easily lead them to err on the side of automated censorship, in an effort to avoid steep fines...
One brighter element of the NetzDG is a requirement that companies publish periodic, detailed transparency reports about the results of the law’s implementation. However, the categories of data for this transparency report proposed by the NetzDG law do not offer a meaningful understanding of how Facebook makes decisions...
Finally, the law misses the opportunity to define a common standard for the disclosure of data, that would allow for it to be meaningfully searched and cross-referenced between private companies...
Business as usual is not an effective way to regulate large private intermediaries. Focusing on basic human rights norms and standards is.
Germany: Law requiring social media companies to remove 'illegal content' violates free speech, according to Human Rights Watch
Author: Human Rights Watch
"Germany: Flawed social media law," 14 February 2018
“Governments and the public have valid concerns about the proliferation of illegal or abusive content online, but the new German law is fundamentally flawed,” said Wenzel Michalski, Germany director at Human Rights Watch. “It is vague, overbroad, and turns private companies into overzealous censors to avoid steep fines, leaving users with no judicial oversight or right to appeal.” Parliament approved the Network Enforcement Act, commonly known as NetzDG, on June 30, 2017, and it took full effect on January 1, 2018.
The law requires large social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, to promptly remove “illegal content,”... ranging widely from insult of public office to actual threats of violence... At least three countries – Russia, Singapore, and the Philippines – have directly cited the German law as a positive example as they contemplate... legislation... Many organizations dedicated to human rights and media freedom have opposed the law since it first appeared in draft form... In an open letter to eight EU commissioners, a group of six civil society and industry associations said the law would chill freedom of speech online by incentivizing companies to remove reported content... The United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, David Kaye, said the draft law was at odds with international human rights standards... Google, which owns YouTube, announced in December 2017 that, over the next year, it would bring the total number of people working to address content that might violate its policies to over 10,000. Facebook told Human Rights Watch that it employs about 10,000 content reviewers globally... primarily to monitor violations of its “Community Standards” but also violations of NetzDG.
- Related stories: Germany: New social media law criticised for violating free speech & shifting regulatory responsibility to co's
- Related in-depth areas: Technology and Human Rights: Digital Freedom
- Related companies: Alphabet Facebook Google (part of Alphabet) Instagram (part of Facebook) YouTube (part of Alphabet)