abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Report

8 Nov 2019

Author:
Centre for Social Innovation, Trinity Business School

IRISH BUSINESS & HUMAN RIGHTS: Benchmarking compliance with the UN Guiding Principles Centre

See all tags

...Breaking down the results by measurement theme, it is evident that performance is weak across the board. However, there are notably low scores identified in Theme B: Embedding Respect and HRDD.

It is also notable that a number of companies scored zero on one or several indicators, including 15 companies in relation to Theme B... On four indicators, no company achieved a score... Two of these related to remedy (A.1.5, commitment to remedy adverse impacts, and C.7, which deals with actually remedying adverse impacts). A further two were HRDD indicators (B.2.2 and B.2.4)...

Just five companies had a total score of greater than 20%, where all three measurement themes were combined. A further seven scored between 10-20%, while ten companies scored less than 10%...

The findings from the application of the CHRB Core Indicators Benchmark to the 22 Irish companies in the study suggest that:

• There is a lack of awareness among Irish companies of the UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights and/or a lack of explicit compliance with these as evidenced by the low scores in the CHRB index; ...

As other States move towards mandatory human rights due diligence, Ireland should not be left behind.