abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Guatemala: Palm oil company, Industria Chiquibul, accused of attempted forced eviction of a community and the detention of a labour rights defender; the company did not respond

On the morning of April 13th, 200 families from the “Tierra Blanca Calle Principal” plantation in the Tierra Blanca microregion of Sayaxché, Petén, Guatemala were victims of an eviction attempt by the palm oil company “Industria Chiquibul, Sociedad Anónima”, carried out by 45 private security agents together with others identified as members of the security and technical-agricultural team of the company. This attack occurred in the context of a land occupation by former workers who are demanding payment of their labor benefits, without any favorable response from the company. In the event, Mr. Izáis Tiul Pop, a 30-yearold community member, was injured.

Another event related to the same palm oil company took place on Monday, April 6th, when Bernabé Gualná Caal, a member of the Sechaj Cooperative community, Raxruhá municipality, Alta Verapaz, was arrested. He worked with Industria Chiquibul from 2016 to 2019. He belonged to a group of workers who demanded that formal contracts be awarded, due to the practice used by agricultural companies of hiring through recruiters, thereby avoiding the direct employer-employee relationship, circumventing labor laws and failing to pay minimum wages and labor benefits.  He remains in preventative prison until his hearing in June 2020.

The Business and Human Rights Resource Centre contacted the company; the company did not respond.