abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

14 Jul 2013

Author:
Joseph E. Stiglitz, New York Times

How Intellectual Property Reinforces Inequality

The good news coming from the Supreme Court was that in the United States, genes could not be patented…This had two enormous practical implications: one is it meant that there could now be competition to develop better, more accurate, less expensive tests for the gene…And the second is that poor women would have a more equal chance to live — in this case, to conquer breast cancer…Myriad’s effort to patent human DNA was one of the worst manifestations of the inequality in access to health…[Refers to Ambry Genetics, Gene by Gene, Myriad Genetics]