abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

21 Aug 2007

Author:
Arvind Ganesan, Director, Business and Human Rights Program, Human Rights Watch

Letter to FTSE Group [re Smithfield Foods]

The March 2007 decision to maintain Smithfield Foods...in the FTSE4Good Index of socially responsible companies was disappointing and raises serious questions about the interpretation and application of your social screening criteria, as discussed below. US courts and labor law authorities have on numerous occasions found Smithfield liable for violations of US labor law.