Extractive companies have had adverse impacts on a broad array of human rights, such as resettlement of communities without adequate consultation and compensation; environmental degradation and its effects on health, sources of livelihood and access to clean water; as well as charges of forced labor, rape and even extrajudicial killings by security forces protecting company assets, with some cases meeting the legal definition of corporate complicity.
- John Ruggie
Natural resources are at the beginning of every supply chain. Their development is essential to the production of energy, consumer goods and food. This means that there are high stakes involved in their use, development and depletion. Natural resources can therefore be a great source of wealth for both governments and local communities, and bring benefits to all citizens. In practice, however, investments in oil, gas, coal, minerals, renewable energy, and large-scale agriculture are often entwined with human rights abuses. This is particularly the case in some of the world’s poorest – but most resource-rich – countries. Under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, it is the responsibility of the companies developing these resources, as well as their buyers and investors, to safeguard the human rights of workers and communities affected by their activities.
As Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege explained in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech:
We love nice cars, jewellery and gadgets. I have a smartphone myself. These items contain minerals found in our country. Often mined in inhuman conditions by young children, victims of intimidation and sexual violence. When you drive your electric car, when you use your smart phone or admire your jewellery, take a minute to reflect on the human cost of manufacturing these objects. As consumers, let us at least insist that these products are manufactured with respect for human dignity.
Related stories and components
USA: SEC's latest draft of payment disclosure rules for oil and mining companies draws criticism from anticorruption groups
On 18 December 2019, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released the latest draft of the Dodd-Frank Section 1504 rule, which requires companies operating in the extractive industries and listed on US stock exchanges to disclose payments to...
Rwanda: Government introduces new tool to hold mining companies accountable for land rehabilitation costs
Author: Michel Nkurunziza, The New Times
"New policy compels mining firms to restore degraded land", 11 December 2019....
Author: Kudzai Kuwaza, The Independent (Zimbabwe)
"Zimbabwe: Miners Push Wage Negotiations to Next Year", 13 December 2019....
The Guardian reported that Emmanuel Essien went missing in July 2019 aboard the Meng Xin 15, a trawler owned by Dalian Meng Xin Ocean Fisheries. Emmanuel Essien worked as a fishing observer in Ghana. His work was part of a government effort to regulate...
Malawi: Civil society and affected communities push for revised mining law to fight corruption, tax avoidance and environmental degradation
Author: Penelope Paliani-Kamanga, The Southern Times
"Malawi losing millions of dollars from illegal mining," 8 November 2019....
Author: Malijet.co, (Mali)
"Reprise de la Société d’Exploitation des Mines d’or de Yatela-SA par l’Etat Malien : Les inquiétudes de la Coalition PCQVP-Mali !", 11 décembre 2019...
Author: Adeole Yusuf, New Telegraph (Nigeria)
‘Oil spill: Shell, Niger Delta community renew battle over $516m compensation’ 9 December 2019...
- Related stories: Nigeria: UK court blocks Nigerian court’s oil spill damages order against Shell as communities renew battle
- Related in-depth areas: Latest news on natural resources Natural Resources
- Related companies: Shell