New report on corporate disclosure under EU Non-financial Reporting Directive finds co's fail to provide meaningful information about impacts on human rights & environment

The EU Non-financial Reporting Directive which came into effect in 2018 requires large companies and financial corporations to disclose information regarding their impacts on society and environment. Civil society has however criticised that the EU Directive fails to specify in sufficient detail what information is to be disclosed. To address this, the Alliance for Corporate Transparency project aims to assess how European companies are implementing the requirements. 

Initial findings of the project, published in February 2019, suggest that of the over 100 companies (including energy and resource extraction, ICT and health care companies) assessed most fail to provide information which is clear enough in terms of concrete issues, targets and principles and thus to understand their impacts and risks, as well as strategies to address them.

Based on the results of their research, the Alliance is suggesting that the legislation should at a minimum clarify requirements for the disclosure of

  • long-term transition plans to a zero-carbon economy by companies in sectors with biggest impacts and risks

  • biodiversity risks and impacts

  • the company’s determination of salient human rights issues and their management.

More information is available below.

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Report
8 February 2019

2018 Research Report

Author: Alliance for Corporate Transparency

Our initial research in 2018 assessed whether companies provided the type of information explicitly required by the NFR Directive, i.e. the description of policies and due diligence processes, outcomes, principal risks (including with respect to business relationships) and KPIs. It also examined if the disclosed information was specific enough to allow understanding of the companies’ impact and strategy. In addition, the research analysed companies’ disclosure on particular important environmental and human rights issues, and on their anti-corruption programmes, for which it provided a specific set of criteria connecting the requirements of the NFR Directive with the emerging consensus on what constitutes material information for these issues...

The general information that most companies provide does not allow readers to understand their impacts and by extension their development, performance and position, as required by the NFR Directive...

Read the full post here

Article
8 February 2019

Co's failing to report meaningful information about their impacts on society & environment

Author: Alliance for Corporate Transparency

The initial findings of the project point to one overarching conclusion: most companies acknowledge in their reports the importance of environmental and social issues, but more often than not this information is not clear enough in terms of concrete issues, targets and principal risks. This year, the project has assessed over 100 companies from the sectors of Energy & Resource Extraction, Information and Communication Technologies, and Health Care...

Most relevant findings:

  • Climate change:
    • 90% of companies report on climate change, but merely 47% specify clearly what precisely their policy has been designed to achieve and how...
  • Social and employee issues:
    • There is a gap between the number of companies providing information on anti-discrimination or equal opportunities policies [...] and the disclosure of the effects of these policies...
    • Very few companies include outsourced workers in their perspective...
    • Similarly, only 10% of companies report on the living wage and very few disclose country-by-country information on region-sensitive issues such equal opportunities (6%) and freedom of association (10%)...
  • Human rights:
    • Over 90% of companies express in their reports a commitment to respect human rights and 70% endeavour to ensure the protection of human rights in their supply chains as well.
    • However, only 36% describe their human rights due diligence system, 26% provide a clear statement of salient issues and 10% describe examples or indicators of effective management of those issues.
    • Companies commonly report information about human rights audits (58%), but the disclosure of results of these audits is far less common (25%) as is disclosure of the actions consequently taken (16%). Similarly, only 8% of companies discuss the limitations of the audits...

Read the full post here