abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

13 Feb 2017

Author:
Elena Goldstein, with contributions by Peter Micek, Access Now

Nokia revamps human rights policy, pledging to avoid "active surveillance"

Original publication date: 10 Feb 2017

...In the wake of these headlines, we want to highlight a development that has not generated quite as much buzz yet will undoubtedly shape the company’s “buzziest” ventures – the updated Nokia Group Human Rights Policy, published in October 2016. As more devices and “things” connect, Nokia’s core role in communications networking will require adhering to the rights-respecting principles of openness and neutrality.  Further, to live up to its mission of “expanding the human possibilities of the connected world,” Nokia must take responsibility for the impact its products have once they leave Nokia Bell Labs and go on the road, in our homes, workplaces, and wherever we travel.  That’s why we are excited to see Nokia taking a proactive step to protect human rights at this juncture...

At this stage, Access Now’s recommendations for Nokia are as follows:

1. Define “lawful interception” and “active/passive surveillance” within formal policy...

2. Clarify and codify the human rights commitment expected of business partners...

3. Introduce remedy to the human rights policy and dialogue...