abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Mar 2007

Author:
Global Labor Strategies

[PDF] Appendices to Undue Influence: Corporations Gain Ground in Battle over China’s New Labor Law

- "Appendix A: Voices from China" [includes comments by Chinese citizens on draft law]... - "Appendix B: Corporate responses to Chinese Labor Law Controversy" [analyses responses to previous Global Labor Strategies report by Ericsson, General Electric, Google, Intel, Nike, Nokia, Procter & Gamble, PSA Peugeot-Citroën, Shell, Tesco; lists non-responding companies: AT&T, Carrefour, DuPont, Maersk (part of A.P. Moller - Maersk), Microsoft, Total, UPS, Wal-Mart, Walt Disney (which has since responded), ABB]... - "Appendix C: October 31, 2006 Congressional Letter to President George Bush" [signed by 27 members of US Congress]... - "Appendix D: United States-China Business Council Critique of GLS and GLS’s Reply"

Timeline