BDA...has welcomed John Ruggie’s ‘protect, respect and remedy’ as a conclusive concept for better implementation of human rights because it distinguishes clearly between the responsibilities of the various players and helps to clarify the complex interface between human rights and companies...BDA developed the following central requests concerning John Ruggie’s recommendations: The clear responsibility of the state for transposition and enforcement of human rights must also be reflected in the recommendations; ...corporate responsibility for human rights cannot sensibly be confined in a “one-size-fits-all” approach; John Ruggie’s recommendations should not limit themselves to multinationals, but must also be addressed to local businesses;...The recommendations cannot be content with formulating expectations for companies. Rather, they must comprise a cost benefit element assessing their impact, including any negative consequences. [includes more detailed comments]