You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

[PDF] John Doe VIII, et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al. - Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Author: O'Melveney & Meyers LLP & Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP [counsel for Exxon Mobil], Published on: 8 August 2011

The complaints in these consolidated cases allege that Indonesian plaintiffs were injured by Indonesian soldiers on Indonesian soil during an Indonesian civil war. But Plaintiffs did not sue Indonesia or its military; nor do they look to the Indonesian courts for relief. Instead, Plaintiffs sued Exxon in a U.S. court under, inter alia, the [Alien Tort Statute, “ATS”]…The panel’s decision warrants en banc review not only because its incorrect expansion of ATS liability threatens to unleash a flood of litigation in U.S. courts for actions lacking any salient connection to the United States, but also because it is in direct and acknowledged conflict with decisions of the Second Circuit, which recognize that there is no corporate liability under the ATS…

Read the full post here