hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

This piece of content is part of multiple stories. We recommend you read this content in the context of one of the following stories:

[PDF] Judging Corporate Accountability in theGlobal Economy

Author: Elliot J. Schrage, Adjunct Senior Fellow in Business and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and Lecturer in Law at Columbia Law School, in Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Published on: 31 December 2002

Simply slamming the door on those seeking relief in U.S. courts is bad foreign policy, bad economic policy, and bad legal practice...An effective policy would harness the power of private litigation in U.S. courts as a vehicle for encouraging other countries and the corporations that operate in them to promote respect for the rule of law and improve the administration of justice. [refers to Barclays, Citigroup, Coca-Cola, DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Fresh Del Monte Produce, Gap, General Motors, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, Levi Strauss, Pfizer, Statoil, Talisman, Texaco (part of ChevronTexaco), Unocal]

Read the full post here

Related companies: Barclays Chevron Citigroup Coca-Cola DaimlerChrysler (now Daimler) Equinor (formerly Statoil) Ford Fresh Del Monte Produce Gap General Motors IBM JPMorgan Chase Levi Strauss Pfizer Talisman (part of Repsol) Texaco (part of Chevron) Unocal (part of Chevron)