abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

9 Jul 2009

Author:
Daniel Bethlehem QC, Legal Adviser, UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office

[PDF] Letter to UN Special Representative John Ruggie

The purpose of this letter is to clarify some of the legal issues underlying the concept of the State duty to protect against human rights abuses by non-State actors under international law... The United Kingdom agrees that certain treaty provisions may impose an express or implied duty on States to protect against non-State human rights abuses. However, it does not consider that there is a general State duty to protect under the core United Nations human rights treaties, nor that such a duty is generally agreed to exist as a matter of customary international law.