You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
en/vale-barclays-receive-public-eye-awards-for-worst-cases-of-contempt-for-environment-human-rights#c63359

Public Eye nominations 2012 - Company responses

Author: compiled by Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, Published on: 18 January 2012

For the annual "Public Eye Awards", which the organisers (Greenpeace Switzerland & Berne Declaration) say are for the "worst cases of contempt for the environment and human rights", six companies were nominated in January 2012. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the companies to respond...: * Barclays response - Rejoinder from World Development Movement to Barclays' response * Freeport-McMoRan response * Samsung response - Rejoinder from SHARPS to Samsung's response * Syngenta response * TEPCO declined to respond * Vale response Blog following company responses: "We Are Not That Bad, Really!", 19 Jan On 27 January 2012 it was announced that Vale had "won" the Public Eye Award 2012, and that a separate award had also been conferred on Barclays, by a jury comprising members of Greenpeace and the Berne Declaration.

Read the full post here

Related companies: Barclays Samsung Syngenta Vale