hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)- The Court finds that the circumstances, as they now present themselves to it, are not such as to require the exercise of its power to indicate provisional measures

Author: International Court of Justice, Published on: 13 July 2006

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), principal judicial organ of the United Nations, today gave its decision on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Argentina in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay...In its Order, the Court finds, by 14 votes to 1, that “the circumstances, as they now present themselves...are not such as to require the exercise of its power under Article 41 of the Statute to indicate provisional measures”...The Court observes...that there is “nothing in the record to demonstrate that the very decision by Uruguay to authorize the construction of the mills [by Botnia & Ence] poses an imminent threat of irreparable damage to the aquatic environment of the River Uruguay or to the economic and social interests of the riparian inhabitants on the Argentine side of the river”...The Court cites earlier decisions in which it stressed the great significance it attaches to respect for the environment.

Read the full post here

Related companies: ENCE Metsä Fibre Oy (formerly Metsä-Botnia)