abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Company Response

5 Oct 2015

Sandak's reponse

…[D]uring the labor process, Sandak strictly adhered to the Legal Mexican framework. After several years of dispute, the Labor Board’s ruling declared the strike movement as void…After the whole process and loss of market capacity in the region, Sandak was unable to reopen the plant… The union, perhaps motivated by false expectations by their legal representation, decided to illegally occupy the factory, impeding free access to the plant and free disposal of property rights against Sandak…It was only then, that Sandak decided to file criminal claims…Sandak has a sister plant in Mexico City, with more than 200 unionized employees…