hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

This piece of content is part of multiple stories. We recommend you read this content in the context of one of the following stories:

Supreme Court may narrow law in human rights cases

Author: Jonathan Stempel, Reuters, Published on: 1 October 2012

The Supreme Court seemed skeptical on Monday of allowing victims of human rights abuses to sue in American courts against the foreign corporations accused of aiding in the atrocities…[S]ome justices suggested they might not close U.S. courts to similar claims against individuals, including those who take refuge in the United States, or to claims involving U.S. companies. In the case,…12 Nigerians accused…Shell…of complicity in a violent crackdown on protesters by military ruler Sani Abacha from 1992 to 1995…[The case is] based on…the Alien Tort Statute…Justice Anthony Kennedy…asked Kiobel's lawyer…whether there was a connection between events in Nigeria and matters "that commenced in the United States or that are closely related to the United States." Kennedy expressed concern that if U.S. courts were to assert jurisdiction, this could expose U.S. corporations to similar lawsuits in other countries. Hoffman countered: "It is possible the plaintiffs could have sued in other places. They sued here because this is where they live."

Read the full post here

Related companies: Shell