hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

Technology and Human Rights

Artificial intelligence, automation, and the gig economy can free us from drudgery, enrich our leisure, and build societies of shared prosperity. They have equal potential to create mass unemployment, hollow-out lives, and worsen inequality.

 

Putting human rights at the core of this new wave of technology in global markets will help define which road we choose. This new portal will be a digital platform for dialogue and action on this choice.

 

Phil Bloomer, Executive Director, Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Technology can be a powerful tool for human rights. Increased access to the internet and the development of social media tools have enabled activists to organise and spread their message more quickly and to broader audiences. Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may significantly expand the availability and quality of data upon which to make informed decisions for the benefit of society. Supporters of these technologies believe that they will unleash new opportunities, increase efficiency, and help maximise human potential.

At the same time, rapid developments in artificial intelligence, automation and robotics raise serious questions about potential impacts on human rights and the future of work, as well as who will benefit and lose from their expansion. There is a risk that the use of machines to increase productivity will result in mounting inequality through downward pressure on wages and loss of jobs. The growth of the “gig economy”, facilitated by technology, has contributed to changing the nature of work by increasing the availability of flexible positions that provide opportunities for some while negatively affecting the livelihoods of others. In addition, the mass collection of data can lead to violations of the right to privacy and make it easier for governments to monitor the activities of activists.  

Many of these impacts are yet unknown. Human rights organisations are currently exploring how to ensure that these technological advances can benefit all people and do not exacerbate inequality for those who are already among the most marginalised.

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

Article
21 January 2010

Hillary Clinton speech on Internet freedom, Jan 2010 - NGO reactions

Author: compiled by Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

[comments & analysis by: - Human Rights First - Human Rights Watch - Index on Censorship - Ethan Zuckerman, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Univ., and Co-founder of Global Voices - Bill Thompson, journalist & technology...

Read more

Story
13 January 2010

Analysts say Google's departure from China would help market leader Baidu, which cooperates closely with govt. on censorship

See full story

Article
13 January 2010

Chinese Internet users praise Google's threat to exit

Author: David Pierson & Barbara Demik, Los Angeles Times

...[While] Chinese cyberspace was awash with chatter on Google's gambit, state-media downplayed the news Tuesday, saying Google had been a victim of cyber attacks in China but made no mention that the company also alleged human rights activists had...

Read more

Story
12 January 2010

Cyber attacks in China on rights activists' accounts lead Google to review China operations - says it will no longer censor search results, may shut down Google.cn

See full story

Article
12 January 2010

Google, Citing Attack, Threatens to Exit China

Author: Andrew Jacobs & Miguel Helft, New York Times

Google said Tuesday that it would stop cooperating with Chinese Internet censorship and consider shutting down its operations in the country altogether, citing assaults from hackers on its computer systems and China’s attempts to “limit free speech on...

Read more

Story
2 March 2008

Yahoo! lawsuit (re China)

...

See full story

Article
14 August 2007

Companies need guidance to face censors abroad

Author: John Palfrey, executive director of Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Univ., & Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet governance & regulation, Oxford Univ., on CNet News.com

If you are in the business of Internet or telecommunications services [and expanding into China, Vietnam, Thailand or Singapore], you are going to be asked to censor the information you provide to people. And you'll probably be asked to turn over...

Read more

Article
13 March 2007

India: Google's Orkut helps cops censor? New cyberterror law...

Author: Xeni Jardin, on Boing Boing

The Indian Express...[is] reporting that Google's social networking service Orkut will cooperate with the Mumbai Police to share IP addresses of users who post “objectionable content” on Orkut. If reports are to be believed, the police need only email...

Read more

Story
1 January 2007

F&C Asset Management report highlights access, security & privacy risks facing technology companies (study engaged 13 companies incl. BT, Deutsche Telekom, Ericsson, Google)

See full story

Article
1 January 2007

[PDF] full report: "Managing Access Security & Privacy in the Global Digital Economy"

Author: F&C Asset Management

Read more