US Security & Exchange Commission issues guidance clarifying conflict minerals rules

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Article
3 June 2013

SEC issues guidance on conflict minerals rules [US]

Author: Kimberley R. Anderson, Dorsey & Whitney LLP

On May 30, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued its long anticipated guidance on the conflict minerals rules...The FAQs provide significant relief for certain kinds of manufacturers, particularly those in the food industry...Perhaps most significantly, the FAQs specify that packaging containing conflict minerals is not considered part of the product...Mining of conflict minerals is not considered manufacturing under the rules. In addition, the FAQs clarify that activities relating to mining are also not considered to be manufacturing...The conflict minerals rules have been subject to an ongoing lawsuit commenced last October by the National Association of Manufacturers, together with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The SEC guidance discussed above provides clarification and welcome relief, particularly to packaged goods manufacturers, but we expect the rules will continue to impose a significant burden on many issuers and their suppliers.

Read the full post here

Article
30 May 2013

Frequently Asked Questions: Conflict Minerals

Author: US Securities & Exchange Commission

In these Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), the Division of Corporation Finance is providing guidance on various aspects of Exchange Act Section 13(p), Rule 13p-1 and Item 1.01 of Form SD relating to disclosure regarding the use of conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries. Please refer to Release No. 34-67716 (August 22, 2012) for further information concerning the Section 13(p) rule. These FAQs are not rules, regulations, or statements of the Commission. Further, the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved these FAQs.

Read the full post here