USA: Amazon accused of 'aggressive anti-union tactics' after training video is leaked; Incl. Amazon's response
Source: Gizmodo screenshot of Amazon training video
Amazon has been accused of "aggressive anti-union tactics" after a 45-minute video produced by Amazon and sent to Team Leaders of the Amazon-owned grocery chain Whole Foods was leaked in September 2018. The video contains six sections, which the narrator states are “specifically designed to give you the tools that you need for success when it comes to labor organizing.” More details can be found in the article linked below, which includes comments by Amazon.
In July 2019, Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited Amazon to respond to allegations of anti-union tactics. Amazon responded that workers must not be penalized or subjected to harassment or intimidation for the non-violent exercise of their right to join or refrain from joining such legal organizations. Its full response is included below.
All components of this story
Business and Human Rights Resource Centre – Amazon Response (August 2019)
Workers must not be penalized or subjected to harassment or intimidation for the non-violent exercise of their right to join or refrain from joining such legal organizations. We have works councils, statutory employee representation obligations, and union agreements in certain countries outside the United States and at certain of our studio operations within the United States...
[The full response is also attached]
- Related stories: USA: Amazon accused of 'aggressive anti-union tactics' after training video is leaked; Incl. Amazon's response
- This is a response from the following companies: Amazon.com
Author: Bryan Menegus, Gizmodo
"Amazon's Aggressive Anti-Union Tactics Revealed in Leaked 45-Minute Video", 26 September 2018
... a 45-minute union-busting training video produced by... [Amazon] was sent to Team Leaders of the grocery chain [Whole Foods]... Recordings of that video, obtained by Gizmodo, provide valuable insight into the company’s thinking and tactics.
...“We are not anti-union, but we are not neutral either,” the video states... [T]he video adds in plain language (emphasis ours):
“We do not believe unions are in the best interest of our customers, our shareholders, or most importantly, our associates. Our business model is built upon speed, innovation, and customer obsession—things that are generally not associated with union. When we lose sight of those critical focus areas we jeopardize everyone’s job security: yours, mine, and the associates’.”
... In following sections, Amazon teaches managers that, where talking to subordinates about unions is concerned, “almost anything you say is lawful,” even providing some examples of what statements are completely kosher even if they’re clearly meant to inspire fear of organization (emphasis ours):
“You would never threaten to close your building just because associates joined a union. But you might need to talk about how having a union could hurt innovation which could hurt customer obsession which could ultimately threaten the building’s continued existence.”
While warning managers that activities like threatening employees cross a line, giving personal opinions that accomplish nearly the same are within their rights. “Opinions can be mild... or strong: ‘Unions are lying, cheating rats.’ The law protects both!”
Throughout, managers are encouraged to express opinions against unions to their workers, and any of signs of potential organization are supposed to be escalated to human resources and general managers immediately...
...Amazon... issued the following statement proceeding publication. Amazon asserts that we “cherry-picked soundbites” from the video and that our characterization does not convey Amazon’s “view on how to create career opportunities for employees.”...