USA: Investors file resolutions with companies at risk for human rights violations due to govt. contracts related to immigration

In December 2018, investor members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility launched a corporate campaign focused on a group of six companies across the private prison, e-commerce, banking and defense sectors, deemed at risk for human rights violations as a result of government contracts that support President Trump’s “zero-tolerance” immigration policies. Investors have filed shareholder resolutions at the following companies:

Private Prisons

  • CoreCivic (allegations of forced labor and failure to provide medical assistance to detainees)
  • GEO Group (issues relating to safety, detainee rights, and medical care)
  • We invited CoreCivic to respond; response provided
  • We invited GEO Group to respond; it did not
  • We previously invited CoreCivic and GEO Group to respond to allegations that they were profiting from the detention of immigrant and asylum-seeking families and the separation of families at the US-Mexico border. More information and responses from both companies are available here.

Technology

  • Amazon (sale of facial recognition technology to government agencies including ICE and state law enforcement) 
  • We invited Amazon to respond; response provided. More information about allegations related to its facial recognition technology is available here.

Financial Services

  • SunTrust (funding for MVM, Inc. and Comprehensive Health Services, which are directly contracted with U.S. government agencies carrying out the “zero tolerance” immigration policy)
  • Wells Fargo (providing revolving credit and term loans to GEO; letters of credit on CoreCivic’s behalf; and underwriting bonds for both GEO and CoreCivic) 
  • We invited SunTrust to respond; it did not
  • We invited Wells Fargo to respond; response provided (Update: In March 2019, Wells Fargo announced that it would end its relationship with GEO Group and CoreCivic.)
  • We previously invited SunTrust and Wells Fargo to respond to allegations that bank and investor financing for CoreCivic & GEO Group supports these two companies to profit from the Trump Administration's harsh immigration policies. Wells Fargo responded, SunTrust declined to respond. More information is available here.
  • We previously invited MVM, Inc. and Comprehensive Heath Services to respond to allegations of profiting from the detention of immigrant and asylum-seeking families. Both companies responses. More information is available here.

Defense Contractor

  • Northrop Grumman (racial bias, privacy and surveillance via Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology (HART) database developed for the Department of Homeland Security)
  • We invited Northrop Grumman to respond; response provided
Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Company non-response
14 January 2019

The GEO Group

Did not respond.

Company response
13 January 2019

CoreCivic's response

Author: CoreCivic

For several years, our company has had in place a detailed Human Rights Policy that clearly outlines our commitments regarding resident rights and treatment, including legal rights, safety and security, healthcare, reentry programming, visitation and standards of living. We believe that this shareholder proposal has already been substantially implemented through our policies, practices, procedures and public disclosures relating to our evaluation of executive compensation... [T]he holistic approach used in evaluating the performance of the company’s senior executives and determining their compensation includes consideration of each of their contributions to furthering CoreCivic’s strategic goals, including our commitment to the human rights and welfare of the individuals entrusted to our care.

... All work programs at our U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities are completely voluntary and operated in full compliance with ICE standards, including federally established minimum wage rates for detainee volunteer labor. Detainees are subject to no disciplinary action whatsoever if they choose not to participate in the work program... We are committed to providing access to high quality healthcare for every individual entrusted to our care.

Download the full document here

Article
13 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at CoreCivic

Author: CoreCivic shareholders

CoreCivic recognizes the importance of performance-based pay, touting the fact that 74% of executive officer compensation in 2017 was tied to performance... We agree that companies should reward behavior that creates long-term value even if it does not translate into short-term financial gain. Respecting the human rights of inmates and detainees, in our view, is such a behavior... CoreCivic’s Human Rights Policy Statement (the “Statement”) asserts that “[a] strong commitment to inmate and detainee rights and proper treatment is essential to our work”... CoreCivic has faced and now faces many lawsuits alleging that it has violated the human rights of inmates and detainees... We believe that incorporating respect for human rights into incentive compensation arrangements for senior executives would encourage focus on the steps necessary to ensure respect, including training, adequate staffing and medical resources.

Read the full post here

Article
13 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at GEO Group

Author: Geo Group shareholders

There are currently three lawsuits alleging forced labor/human trafficking at GEO immigrant detention centers... Human Rights performance is critical to GEO’s reputation and long-term growth. In order to ensure that the company is adequately respecting human rights in its facilities and meeting the objectives outlined in the portion of its Global Human Rights Policy (the “Policy”) that addresses “Respect for Our Inmates and Detainees,” which lacks specificity, additional public disclosure regarding GEO’s implementation is necessary... Shareholders request that GEO report annually on its website to investors, beginning in September 2019, on how it implements the portion of the Policy that addresses “Respect for Our Inmates and Detainees,” including: 1. How GEO ensures that its employees are aware of, and know how to apply, the company’s commitment to inmate/detainee human rights; 2. Metrics used to assess human rights performance, including any process for independent outside verification of such metrics; and 3. How GEO remedies shortcomings in human rights performance.

Read the full post here

Article
13 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at SunTrust Banks

Author: SunTrust shareholders

[S]hareholders of SunTrust Banks, Inc... urge the Board of Directors to establish a Board Committee on Human Rights, to create company policies and review existing policies, above and beyond matters of legal compliance, on the human rights of individuals in the US and worldwide, including adopting and assessing criteria for evaluating potential clients’ corporate social responsibility record and human rights performance... SunTrust is reportedly a source of funding for MVM, Inc. and Comprehensive Health Services, which are directly contracted to U.S. government agencies carrying out the “zero tolerance” immigration policies that have led to family separations and child detentions... SunTrust has had the following financial relationships with CoreCivic and GEO Group, corporations which operate private prisons... Establishing a separate Board Committee on Human Rights would elevate board level oversight and governance regarding human rights issues implicated by the company's activities and policies and provide a vehicle to fulfill the Board’s fiduciary responsibilities for oversight of these issues.

Read the full post here

Article
11 January 2019

Amazon's response

Author: Amazon

Amazon responded with the following links:

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/thoughts-on-machine-learning-accuracy/
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/some-quick-thoughts-on-the-public-discu...

Download the full document here

Company response
11 January 2019

Northrop Grumman's response

Author: Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman has a strong human rights policy and we will be addressing the shareholder proposal directly.

Download the full document here

Article
11 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at Amazon

Author: Amazon shareholders

...[S]hareholders are concerned Amazon’s facial recognition technology (“Rekognition”) poses risk to civil and human rights and shareholder value... Shareholders have little evidence our Company is effectively restricting the use of Rekognition to protect privacy and civil rights... [S]hareholders request that the Board of Directors prohibit sales of facial recognition technology to government agencies unless the Board concludes, after an evaluation using independent evidence, that the technology does not cause or contribute to actual or potential violations of civil and human rights.

Read the full post here

Article
11 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at Northrop Grumman

Author: Northrop Grumman shareholders

While Northrop Grumman adopted a Human Rights Policy in 2013, it does not disclose how the policy is operationalized to reduce the risks that the company may cause or contribute to adverse human rights impacts. Investors are unable to assess how Northrop Grumman embeds respect for human rights into the process for vetting and implementing contracts with the U.S. Government or foreign governments, or the effectiveness of any systems which may be in place to prevent or mitigate human rights risks... Shareholders request that the Board of Directors prepare a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on Northrop Grumman’s management systems and processes to implement its Human Rights Policy.

Read the full post here

Article
10 January 2019

Shareholder resolution filed at Wells Fargo

Author: Wells Fargo shareholders

[S]hareholders of Wells Fargo & Company... urge the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to report to shareholders by December 31, 2019 on how WFC is identifying and addressing human rights risks to WFC related to the Trump Administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement policy, which aims to prosecute all persons who enter or attempt to enter the United States (U.S.), including the detention without parole of asylum-seekers and the separation of minor children from parents accused of entering the U.S. illegally... WFC has come under fire for its relationships with GEO Group and CoreCivic, private prison companies that contract with ICE and benefit from more aggressive immigration enforcement... WFC has played an important role in financing GEO and CoreCivic’s businesses: WFC is co-syndication agent for the bank group providing revolving credit and term loans to GEO; has issued letters of credit on CoreCivic’s behalf; and has underwritten bonds for both GEO and CoreCivic.

Read the full post here