abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

12 Mar 2007

Author:
[comment] Theodore Moran, professor of international financial diplomacy, Georgetown Univ.; Gary Hufbauer senior fellow at Peterson Institute of International Economics [USA], in Financial Times

Why a ‘grand deal’ on labour could end trade talks

US congressional Democrats, led by Sandy Levin and Barney Frank, are insisting that core labour standards promoted by the United Nations’ International Labour Organisation be included in forthcoming trade agreements as part of a “grand bargain”. They want to make ratification of free trade agreements (with Panama, Peru and Colombia)...conditional on the inclusion of enforceable ILO standards. An inconvenient truth poses a huge obstacle to the proposed “bargain”: US labour laws are either openly inconsistent with core ILO standards, or they could be challenged by lawyers if ILO standards trumped established statutes and long-standing interpretations... The practical effect would be to stop US trade negotiations.