abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapelocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewprofilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathtagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponsible en español y se muestra enEnglish

Artículo

[PDF] Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al. [US Govt. amicus brief in partial support of affirmance]

This office is informed by the by the Department of State that, in its view, after weighing the various considerations, allowing suits based on conduct occurring in a foreign country in the circumstances presented in Filartiga is consistent with the foreign relations interests of the United States, including the promotion of respect for human rights. For this reason…there is no reason to question the result in this case. Other claims based on conduct in a foreign country should be considered in light of the circumstances in which they arise.

Part of the following stories

Perfil de las demandas judiciales contra Shell por actividades en Nigeria

US Govt. files amicus brief with US Supreme Court for Kiobel v. Shell rehearing in partial support of affirmance