abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Historia

11 Nov 2020

Outreach to companies asking for disclosure of payment terms & internal policy commitments re. COVID-19 (Nov-Dec 2020)

Ver todas las etiquetas

Actions taken by fashion brands to protect their profits at the expense of worker rights have had profoundly negative impacts on vulnerable garment workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brands have used their disproportionate power over factory suppliers to cancel agreed orders, pay suppliers substantially reduced prices for orders, or to grossly extend payment terms. These decisions have a devastating knock-on impact on the 60 million garment workers in fashion supply chains. Millions of workers have lost their jobs, have had months of unpaid wages, or have been forced to work for a fraction of their usual wage – an amount that has never been enough to cover a basic standard of living.

Labour rights advocates are appealing to brands to contribute to wage funds to make up for the wages that have been lost, estimated as $5.8 billion over just a three-month period from March – May.

In May 2020, Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) conducted a survey of 35 fashion brands and retailers (26 responded) regarding their response to the pandemic as it related to garment workers. The questions and full set of survey responses and non-responses can be found here.

In November-December 2020, BHRRC undertook a follow-up survey with the original 35 companies and an additional 16, seeking responses from 51 companies (36 responded). The questions and full set of survey responses and non-responses can be found below.

The responses to both surveys informed our COVID-19 Apparel Action Tracker.

Respuestas de la empresa

adidas Ver respuesta
PVH (Phillips-Van Heusen) Ver respuesta
Cotton On Group Ver respuesta
Pentland Brands Ver respuesta
Zalando SE Ver respuesta
Kering (formerly PPR, Pinault-Printemps-Redoute) Ver respuesta
Target Ver respuesta
Amazon.com Ver respuesta
Aldi Nord Ver respuesta
Aldi Süd Ver respuesta
Decathlon Ver respuesta
Primark (part of Associated British Foods) Ver respuesta
Carrefour Ver respuesta
Arcadia Group

Sin respuesta

Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) Ver respuesta
Fast Retailing Ver respuesta
Marks & Spencer Ver respuesta
VF Corp Ver respuesta
Bestseller Ver respuesta
Boohoo

Sin respuesta

New Look Ver respuesta
Kmart Australia (part of Wesfarmers)

Sin respuesta

Target Australia (part of Wesfarmers)

Sin respuesta

LVMH Moët Hennessy – Louis Vuitton

Sin respuesta

Hermès

Sin respuesta

Tapestry (Formerly Coach)

Sin respuesta

The Children's Place

Sin respuesta

Hanesbrands

Sin respuesta

Matalan

Sin respuesta

Esprit

Sin respuesta

Tchibo Ver respuesta
Burberry Ver respuesta
Inditex Ver respuesta
Debenhams

Sin respuesta

Levi Strauss Ver respuesta
Sainsbury's Ver respuesta
John Lewis (part of John Lewis Partnership) Ver respuesta
Benetton Group Ver respuesta
Lululemon Athletica Ver respuesta
G-Star Raw

Sin respuesta

Walmart

Sin respuesta

N Brown Group Ver respuesta
The Very Group Ver respuesta

Línea del tiempo