abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Article

8 Sep 2020

Auteur:
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights

COVID-19: ECCHR Paper outlines how apparel brands used force majeure to shirk supply chain responsibilities amid pandemic, calling for accountability

UN Women/Fahad Abdullah Kaizer

“Force Majeure: How global apparel brands are using the Covid-19 pandemic to stiff suppliers and abandon workers”, September 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the fragilities and inequities in global garment supply chains. In early 2020, global apparel brands and retailers were confronted with a steep and sudden drop in consumer demand. They responded by suspending or cancelling orders with their suppliers worldwide. Many brands, such as Primark and Topshop, refused to pay for orders that were in production, already produced or even shipped. Others demanded sharp discounts on the agreed price before accepting the produced goods.

The policy paper Force majeure: How global apparel brands are using the COVID-19 pandemic to stiff suppliers and abandon workers by the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, ILAW and the Worker Rights Consortium explores the power imbalances between brands and suppliers, and their contractual manifestation. It examines the law of force majeure and related doctrines, and how they apply to the current circumstances. The paper explains how brands violate their due diligence obligations through cancelling orders. It also calls for better access to accountability mechanisms for workers to enforce brands’ responsible supply chain practices.