abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

訴訟(SLAPP)

2019年6月18日

Al-Marsad

ステータス: ONGOING

Date lawsuit was filed
2019年6月18日
日付の精度
年月が正しい
Al-Marsad
犯罪
適用できません
人権団体
訴訟: SLAPPs
法的請求: 名誉毀損, ボイコット
訴訟の提起者: Company
ターゲット: Group, Organisation or Institution
申立の提出場所: イスラエル
事件の発生場所: イスラエル
Energix Renewable Energies イスラエル 再生可能エネルギー

Energix Renewable Energies

企業の回答

ソース

On 18 June 2019, the Arab Human Rights Centre in Golan Heights (“Al-Marsad”), was notified that Energix Renewable Energies (“Energix”) filed a suit alleging that the organization had violated Israel’s defamation law and the anti-boycott law. The lawsuit came after Al-Marsad published a final report on its investigation about Energix’s development of an energy project that would occupy agricultural land of the occupied Golan that is still controlled by native Syrians. Al-Marsad argues that there is no violation of the defamation law or the anti-boycott law and requests the dismissal of the complaint since the lawsuit aims to stop their human rights work.  On 1 October 2019, Al-Marsad submitted its response denying the violation of the Anti-Defamation Act of 1965 and the Anti-Boycott Act of 2011. The response requests the dismissal of the lawsuit.  In February 2020, an initial hearing took place before the Nazareth Magistrate’s Court. Al-Marsad rejected a possible settlement with the company. Subsequent hearings were postponed due to Covid-19 restrictions and due to Israeli holidays. Deliberations in the case are still in early stages. We invited Energix Renewable Energies to respond; it did not. We will publish a response if received in the future