abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

コンテンツは以下の言語で利用可能です: English, 简体中文, 繁體中文

訴訟

2007年3月1日

著者:
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Nokia lawsuit (re HBV discrimination in China)

ステータス: CLOSED

Date lawsuit was filed
2007年3月1日
不明
労働者
申立の提出場所: 中国
事件の発生場所: 中国
訴訟の種類: 国内

企業

Nokia フィンランド テクノロジー、テレコム、エレクトロニクス

ソース

诺基亚乙肝歧视案(中文版)

In 2007, a Chinese job applicant sued Nokia alleging discriminatory employment practices because of his Hepatitis-B status. The court ruled against the plaintiff because he was unable to authenticate a recording between himself and a Nokia human resources employee which was relied on as evidence at trial.

Factual Background

A Chinese job applicant alleged that Nokia China cancelled plans to hire him after he underwent a company medical examination and tested positive for the Hepatitis B virus (HBV). Government and scholarly sources estimate that between 90 and 130 million Chinese people carry HBV, and many of them suffer workplace discrimination because of this status.  Chinese government regulations prohibit employment discrimination based on HBV status.  The government has publicly reminded employers of these prohibitions to try to discourage discrimination against HBV carriers.

Legal Argument

The applicant sued Nokia for discriminatory employment practices. He claimed 500,000 yuan (about $70,000) in emotional damages in what is reported to be the first HBV discrimination case against a foreign multinational in China. 

Legal Proceeding 

In March 2007, the individual filed suit. The Dongguan People’s Court accepted the case in May 2007, and court proceedings commenced in August 2007.  Nokia claimed that it denied the applicant employment because another candidate was more competent for the position, and because he was colour-blind.  Nokia pointed out that it had hired several workers for the Nokia Dongguan factory who are HBV carriers. 

The applicant submitted a recording of a conversation between himself and a Nokia human resources employee, in which the Nokia employee implied that his HBV status was the reason the company would not hire him.  Nokia denied that the person on the recording was employed by Nokia.  

At the conclusion of the proceedings, the judge decided to conduct a retrial of the case.  The retrial of the case was taken by the Dongguan Intermediate Court, and it took place on 31 July 2008.  On the same day, the applicant filed a public complaint against the responsible judges of Dongguan Intermediate Court for unduly closing the trial to the public.

Latest Update

On 22 October 2008, Dongguan Intermediate Court ruled against the applicant.  The court ruled against the applicant because he was unable to authenticate the recording of the conversation between himself and a Nokia human resources employee on which he relied during the trial.