abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

This page is not available in Burmese and is being displayed in English

Story

Cambodia: CENTRAL, CCAWDU and CATU's report contradicts ILO Better Factories Cambodia's assessment of garment factories; some unions protest against CENTRAL

CENTRAL report coverage

CENTRAL, CATU, and C.CAWDU document the extent to which Freedom of Association (FOA) has been contravened across Cambodiaโ€™s garment, footwear, and travel goods factories, undermining the countryโ€™s human rights commitments, violating the countryโ€™s constitution and labor law, and weakening the ability of international brands to undertake robust due diligence within their supply chains.

The report evaluates Better Factories Cambodia (BFC) and whether their current processes appropriately assess and adequately report on employer-imposed barriers to freedom of association. As part of the International Labour Organizationโ€™s (ILO) Better Work Program, one of BFCโ€™s core activities is to monitor export apparel factoriesโ€™ compliance against international labor standards to inform brands and buyers of labor conditions in each factory. BFC currently assesses working conditions in 703 factories across Cambodia, employing approximately 651,000 workers.

After the report published, about 70 union federations and unions protested against CENTRAL, which they alleged restricted union representativesโ€™ freedom of association.

Timeline