abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

This page is not available in Burmese and is being displayed in English

Article

7 Mar 2025

Author:
Sarah Chenoun, Frank Bold

EU: Experts analyse key implications of Omnibus package for CSDDD, CSRD, and EU Taxonomy

โ€œEU Omnibus Unveiled: Whatโ€™s at stake for the EUโ€™s sustainability framework?โ€, 7 March 2025

Frank Boldโ€™s Julia Otten presented our views at a webinar co-organised with ShareAction, WWF European Policy Office, the European Coalition for Corporate Justice and the World Benchmarking Allianceโ€ฆ

Find below a summary of the key points discussedโ€ฆ

1. Reducing the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive below OECD and UNGPs standardsโ€ฆ

By discouraging companies from checking their suppliers beyond Tier 1, the Omnibus proposal breaks with the risk-based approach established by international standardsโ€ฆ

Allowing companies to only suspend contracts with high-risks suppliers and review their due diligence process every 5 years will enable them to continue engaging in risky business ties with little accountabilityโ€ฆ

Narrowing the engagement with smaller suppliers puts workers and the environment at greater risk.

2. A race to the bottom for civil liability and penaltiesโ€ฆ

The deletion of EU-wide civil liability provision is a clear step back from harmonisationโ€ฆ

The cancellation of the obligation to provide representation mechanisms will make it harder for victims to be represented by NGOs and trade unionsโ€ฆ

Changes to administrative liability in the CSRD now give Member States a lot of discretion in setting maximum limits for penalties, which will lead to a race to the bottomโ€ฆ

3. Legal uncertainty and major confusion for companiesโ€™ sustainability reporting

The so-called โ€˜Stop the clockโ€™ proposal is misleading for companies on what is applicable to them and how to prepareโ€ฆ

It is crucial to discuss what midcaps actually need, and provide them with proportionate standardsโ€ฆ

The omission of sector-specific guidance means that the European Commission has given away its own power to international standard settersโ€ฆ

4. Less data, less accountability: a weakened EU Taxonomy that undercuts sustainable investmentโ€ฆ

The 10% materiality threshold threatens the objectives of the EU Taxonomy, โ€ฆ

The combination of the reduction in scope of the EU Taxonomy and the materiality threshold threatens the Green Bond initiative that depends on this dataโ€ฆ

Part of the following timelines

Development & implementation of the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: 'Omnibus' updates