abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Esta página não está disponível em Português e está sendo exibida em English

Ação judicial (SLAPP)

Pete Kolbenschlag

Status: DISMISSED

Data em que a ação judicial foi iniciada
2 Jan 2017
Precisão da data
Ano e Mês Correto
Pete Kolbenschlag
Civil
Masculino
Líder ou membro da comunidade afetada
Ações judiciais: SLAPPs
Argumentos legais: Difamação
Processo movido por: Company
Alvo: Individual
Local de Arquivamento: Estados Unidos da América
Localização do Incidente: Estados Unidos da América
SG Interests Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão Resposta da empresa

Fontes

Pete Kolbenschlag is a public land, conservation, and climate change activist living in the North Fork Valley of Colorado. As the director of Mountain West Strategies, he helps communities organize campaigns around oil and gas development. In February 2017, he was sued for libel by SG Interests (SGI), an oil and gas company, after posting an online comment in response to an article about the company. SG Interests’ complaint claimed that Kolbenschlag’s statement was contrary to the truth and would impact what people think about the company. The case was dismissed as frivolous and vexatious by a Delta County District Court in 2017. The company appealed a three-judge panel of the Colorado Court of Appeals, and in June 2019, the lower court decision was upheld. In July 2019, that same appellate court denied an SG Interests petition to rehear the case by the full court.